<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DomainWeek.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainweek.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainweek.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Where is the best place to sell your domain names?</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/best-place-to-sell-domain-names/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/best-place-to-sell-domain-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Selling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I typically like to wait for an end user to approach me with a good offer, however sometimes it is nice to just sell some domains on your own schedule.  I have a couple of big purchases on the horizon, so this week I have been testing a few of the auction sites. 
First, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="money" src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/laptop-money.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="165" align="right" />I typically like to wait for an end user to approach me with a good offer, however sometimes it is nice to just sell some domains on your own schedule.  I have a couple of big purchases on the horizon, so this week I have been testing a few of the auction sites. </p>
<p>First, I went to Bido to see what it was all about.  The system there did not seem very intuitive and it appears that you have to pay to list your names, then people have to vote on it, then if you get enough votes it goes to auction, and even then it may or may not sell.  I started to list a name there and then canceled the listing and decided to try something else.  I know that many people are happy with Bido and it sounds like it is improving each day, but I am just looking for something easier.</p>
<p>Next, I listed a small group of names on Godaddy Auctions.  When you visit the Godaddy Auctions page, there is a link that says &#8220;list a domain&#8221; and you can list it as buy it now, offer/counter offer, offer/counter offer with buy it now, or a seven day auction.   If you have names registered at Godaddy, you can also list a name by logging in to your account&#8217;s domain manager section, then selecting the name and clicking the tab &#8220;cash in&#8221; and selecting &#8220;List on GoDaddy Auctions.&#8221;  The only difference here is that I was unable to select the 7 day auction.  The buy it now, offer/counter offer, offer/counter offer with buy it now options were there, but no way to push a name from your account to an auction.  I would like to be able to send a name from my account to a 7 day auction, and was unable to do so without leaving the account manager section, going to the auctions section, and then manually enter the name and selecting a 7 day auction.  Am I missing something here?</p>
<p>I then remembered seeing a &#8220;List Now on SnapNames&#8221; link in my Moniker account so I decided to try that.  I selected a small group of names from my Moniker account and clicked the &#8220;List Now on SnapNames&#8221; link.  I was taken directly to SnapNames and was given the option to set the minimum bid price and auction start time.  So far, I have found this to be the easiest way to sell names - just a few clicks and I was done.</p>
<p>If you are in no hurry to sell your names, I think the best places to list them are Sedo and Afternic.  If you want to sell some right away, I think that Moniker to SnapNames system is the easiest.  Let me know what you think though - where is the best place to sell your domain names?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/best-place-to-sell-domain-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DomainState.com is for sale</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/domainstatecom-is-for-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/domainstatecom-is-for-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Forums]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just received this via email:
After over 7 years of running Domainstate we have decided to sell the site. It is with a sad heart that we have realised that it is no longer something we can commit the same level of energy as we once did.
Our aim is to have the site sold within the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just received this via email:</p>
<blockquote><p>After over 7 years of running Domainstate we have decided to sell the site. It is with a sad heart that we have realised that it is no longer something we can commit the same level of energy as we once did.</p>
<p>Our aim is to have the site sold within the next couple of weeks and we are considering offers now so any interested parties please contact us ASAP at admin@domainstate.com.</p>
<p>We&#8217;d recommend that anyone with any particularly sensitive information within their private messages take advantage of the archive/delete facility within the private messages section of the user control panel in anticipation of a change of ownership.</p>
<p>We&#8217;d like to thank everybody for their contributions to the site over the years and wish everyone well for the future.</p>
<p>Domainstate Admins</p>
<p>There is a thread to discuss this here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.domainstate.com/showthread.php3?threadid=103873&#038;s=">http://www.domainstate.com/showthread.php3?threadid=103873&#038;s=</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks to Snoopy, Matt and Safesys for creating such a great resource and best of luck with the sale and your future endeavors. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/domainstatecom-is-for-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flashback: 10 years ago today, I registered my first domain name</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/flashback-10-years-ago-today-i-registered-my-first-domain-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/flashback-10-years-ago-today-i-registered-my-first-domain-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ten years ago today, I registered my first domain name.  At the time, registrations cost $70 for two years.  Check out the scan of the invoice below.  Also, you did not have to pay right away.  You could actually register a name and they would send you a bill in the mail.  This resulted in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="size-full wp-image-110 " title="laptop-netsol" src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/laptop-netsol.jpg" alt="laptop-netsol" width="240" height="165" align="right" />Ten years ago today, I registered my first domain name.  At the time, registrations cost $70 for two years.  Check out the scan of the invoice below.  Also, you did not have to pay right away.  You could actually register a name and they would send you a bill in the mail.  This resulted in the earliest form of &#8220;domain tasting&#8221; where someone could &#8220;register&#8221; a name and then try to sell it before they had to pay the bill.  If they sold it, they would pay the bill when it arrived and transfer the name to the buyer.  If they did not sell the name, the would simply not pay the bill.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111" title="domain-registration" src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/domain-registration.jpg" alt="domain-registration" width="450" height="595" /></p>
<p>Also, in case you are wondering, the domain I registered is one I use for my personal email address.  I still like it, but it does not have much resale value.  I didn&#8217;t start registering more valuable names until a few years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/flashback-10-years-ago-today-i-registered-my-first-domain-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Schwartz - The &#8220;Bobblehead&#8221; King</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/rick-schwartz-the-bobblehead-king/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/rick-schwartz-the-bobblehead-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bobbleheads]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Domain Conference]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rick Schwartz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TRAFFIC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/09/24/rick-schwartz-the-bobblehead-king/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a special surprise at the registration desk given to the first 250 people who arrived at the TRAFFIC conference in New York; a custom Rick &#8220;The Domain King&#8221; Schwartz bobblehead.  The custom bobblehead was produced by Bobbleheads.com owner Warren Royal and approved by the domain king himself.  250 of the bobbleheads [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/laptop-bobblehead-king.gif" alt="The Bobblehead King" align="right" />There was a special surprise at the registration desk given to the first 250 people who arrived at the TRAFFIC conference in New York; a custom Rick &#8220;The Domain King&#8221; Schwartz bobblehead.  The custom bobblehead was produced by <a href="http://www.bobbleheads.com" target="_blank">Bobbleheads.com</a> owner Warren Royal and approved by the domain king himself.  250 of the bobbleheads were given to attendees of the TRAFFIC conference, and the remaining 250 limited edition bobbleheads are now available for purchase at Bobbleheads.com using the following link:<span style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: #1f497d;"><a href="http://www.bobbleheads.com/product/tabid/85/p-168-domain-king.aspx"><br />
http://www.bobbleheads.com/product/tabid/85/p-168-domain-king.aspx</a></span></p>
<p> <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Update: <a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2008/09/26/one-last-new-auction-from-new-york/" target="_blank">Michael Berkins</a> is auctioning a <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&amp;item=170266748727">signed Rick Schwartz Bobblehead on ebay</a> for charity, ending October 6, 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/rick-schwartz-the-bobblehead-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Funny Video: The Domain Name Dollar Store</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/funny-video-the-domain-name-dollar-store/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/funny-video-the-domain-name-dollar-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/09/03/funny-video-the-domain-name-dollar-store/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this great video by the guys at QuietLibrary.com. If you thought all the good names were taken, think again, &#8230;AND get your credit card ready!

 
Also, check out the Domain Name Dollar Store online at www.DomainNameDollarStore.com
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this great video by the guys at QuietLibrary.com. If you thought all the good names were taken, think again, &#8230;AND get your credit card ready!</p>
<p><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7FZ1M_UmQes&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7FZ1M_UmQes&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></embed></object><br />
 <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Also, check out the Domain Name Dollar Store online at <a href="http://www.DomainNameDollarStore.com">www.DomainNameDollarStore.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/funny-video-the-domain-name-dollar-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Digg the future of search?</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/is-digg-the-future-of-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/is-digg-the-future-of-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Made for AdSense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/07/23/is-digg-the-future-of-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is arguable the best search engine out there, and yet when using it we sometimes get poor quality search results and &#8220;made for adsense&#8221; sites.  In fact, many of us in the domain and/or SEO industry are responsible for some of those sites.  What is a &#8220;made for adsense&#8221; site?  Well, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/laptop-digg.jpg" alt="Google digs digg!" align="right" />Google is arguable the best search engine out there, and yet when using it we sometimes get poor quality search results and &#8220;made for adsense&#8221; sites.  In fact, many of us in the domain and/or SEO industry are responsible for some of those sites.  What is a &#8220;made for adsense&#8221; site?  Well, they can be one page landers or they can be large, multi-page websites and they typically have 3 adsense ad areas per page.  On the surface, they seem to contain relevant content, but when you actually read the text you discover that it is keyword rich and information poor.  For example, here is an excerpt from a site that I would classify as &#8220;made for adsense&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Bacardi&#8217;s current headquarters and main production facility is situated most fittingly at an island in the Caribbean known as Puerto Rico. It is at the capital of this Caribbean paradise that one of Bacardi&#8217;s major facilities is situated.</p></blockquote>
<p>What?  Did it just take 38 words to say &#8220;Bacardi is located in Puerto Rico&#8221; <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This is where the Digg voting method could help the search results.  Google could display their search results along with a way to vote on the results.  Useful sites get voted up, bad sites get voted down. This social search feature would not replace their algorithm, it would likely be one additional factor that they could use to improve the results or pagerank.   They could also add digg style reviews or comments for each site.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that this is all simply speculation, but perhaps it is part of the motivation behind the <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/22/google-in-final-negotiations-to-acquire-digg-for-around-200-million/" target="_blank">rumored Google purchase of Digg</a>.  Obviously, any changes to the Google algorithm will have massive impact on domainers and site owners.  If people are able to review site content, it could be bad news for <strong>meaningless</strong> &#8220;made for adsense&#8221; sites.  On the other hand, it could be good news for people who develop sites with great and unique content.  Content (ideally combined with a great domain name) is and always has been king, so those who develop quality sites with great content should have nothing to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/is-digg-the-future-of-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video.us auction ends at $12,000</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/videous-auction-ends-at-12000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/videous-auction-ends-at-12000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/07/17/videous-auction-ends-at-12000/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The auction for Video.us ended at 12pm this afternoon, and this time it sold for $12,000.  The name sold for $75,000 last year and then $18,500 earlier this year.
Check out Ron Jackson&#8217;s recent post on DNJournal.com for more information about the strange history of this domain name:
In the past 15 months, two previous owners [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/laptop-galcomm-sold.jpg" alt="Sold!" align="right" />The auction for Video.us ended at 12pm this afternoon, and this time it sold for $12,000.  The name sold for $75,000 last year and then $18,500 earlier this year.</p>
<p>Check out Ron Jackson&#8217;s recent post on DNJournal.com for more information about the strange history of this domain name:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the past 15 months, two previous owners lost big bucks after buying Video.us only to see the registry delete the domain for Nexus/WhoIs violations. Now we will see if the third time is the charm for this star-crossed domain. The story began in April 2007 when a European company bought the domain from its American owner for $75,000 (the highest reported price for a .us domain to date).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2008/dailyposts/07-15-08.htm" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/videous-auction-ends-at-12000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which is worse, the company name or their domain name?</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/which-is-worse-the-company-name-or-their-domain-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/which-is-worse-the-company-name-or-their-domain-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/29/which-is-worse-the-company-name-or-their-domain-name/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Ok, so I think I found the worst company name ever combined with the worst choice for domain names ever.  This one is so bad, it might even make Aaron from good URL bad URL cry.  It is so bad that I had to stop and take a picture of it (check out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/laptop-trandotcom.jpg" alt="The puzzle image on the home page is a good fit for this puzzling name." align="right" /></p>
<p>Ok, so I think I found the worst company name ever combined with the worst choice for domain names ever.  This one is so bad, it might even make Aaron from <a href="http://www.goodurlbadurl.com" title="Good URL, Bad URL" target="_blank">good URL bad URL</a> cry.  It is so bad that I had to stop and take a picture of it (check out the picture below).   My wife and I were driving to a restaurant when I noticed a sign with a company name - ΤranDotCom.  I said &#8220;Hey, that&#8217;s a pretty good domain name, Τran.com.&#8221;  My wife said, &#8220;Yeah, but why did they spell out the dot, instead of just using the symbol?&#8221;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/trandotcom.jpg" alt="Company Sign" /></p>
<p>I quickly pulled out my iPhone and entered &#8220;Τran.com&#8221; and sure enough, they do not own it.  I said, &#8220;you don&#8217;t think&#8230;&#8221; and then entered &#8220;ΤranDotCom.com&#8221; which not only worked, but made the story even better. ΤranDotCom.com actually redirects to their company site at &#8220;www.ΤranDotCom.info.&#8221;  Yep, that&#8217;s right, their company website is officially <a href="http://www.TranDotCom.info" title="What?" target="_blank">ΤranDotCom.info</a>.  I&#8217;m sure they are a great company, but I wonder how much time they waste just explaining their website address to people.</p>
<p>Can you imagine working for that company and talking to a customer on the phone.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Employee:</strong>   Hello and thank you for calling ΤranDotCom.<br />
<strong> Customer:</strong> Hi, I visited Tran.com and I could not find out anything about your company.<br />
<strong>Employee:</strong>  What website did you visit?<br />
<strong> Customer:</strong>  Tran.com<br />
<strong>Employee:</strong>  Oh, our website is actually ΤranDotCom.info.<br />
<strong> Customer:</strong>  Well, I just entered Tran.com.info and nothing happened.<br />
<strong>Employee:</strong>  Would you prefer to just send us an email?<br />
<strong> Customer:</strong> Sure, what is your email addres?<br />
<strong>Employee:</strong>  Our email address is info@ΤranDotCom.info<br />
<strong> Customer:</strong>  Ok, got it.  info@tran.com.info</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, I think that they probably had a few too many conversations like that because after reviewing their website, it appears that for email they are using tdcemail.com.  <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Bonus Picture: Employee of the month parking spot</strong><br />
<img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/trandotcomparking.jpg" alt="Employee of the Month Parking" /><br />
Understandably, the employee in charge of domain name selection  has never parked there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/which-is-worse-the-company-name-or-their-domain-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UUOPD - Mix.com</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/uuopd-mixcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/uuopd-mixcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[UUOPD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/20/uuopd-mixcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today’s UUOPD (Unusual Usage of Premium Domains) website is Mix.com. Mix is not just a three letter domain, it is also a word with several uses.  Apparently though, the owner thinks the best use is to put a picture of a girl in a bunny suit with a couple of fire extinguishers, next to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/laptop-mix.jpg" alt="Mix.com" align="right" border="0" />Today’s UUOPD (Unusual Usage of Premium Domains) website is <a href="http://www.mix.com" title="Greetings from MIX.COM !!" target="_blank">Mix.com</a>. Mix is not just a three letter domain, it is also a word with several uses.  Apparently though, the owner thinks the best use is to put a picture of a girl in a bunny suit with a couple of fire extinguishers, next to a picture of a daffy duck jack-in-the-box Christmas ornament.  I am starting to think that in order to get these images, the owner just went to Google image search, clicked the &#8220;I&#8217;m feeling lucky&#8221; button, and then did not get lucky.</p>
<p>Moving on, we see a couple of links that say &#8220;What we do&#8221; and link to Barnes and Noble.  The link shows results for a search on Barnes and Noble for the search term &#8220;Bill Youdleman.&#8221;  According to whois, Bill is the owner of this site.  According to the Barnes and Noble website, he is an engineer on these CDs, which I guess explains why he registered this domain name.</p>
<p>Seriously though, congrats to Bill for having the foresight to register such a great name seventeen years ago, in 1991. <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/uuopd-mixcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something to Think about&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/something-to-think-about/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/something-to-think-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/24/something-to-think-about/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[23 years ago today, the domain name Think.com was registered.  Some of you might think you registered your first name a long time ago, but think about this; Think.com probably preceded your first registration by a decade or more.  Some of you might think you started registering domains too late, but think about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wp-content/uploads/laptop-think.jpg" alt="I think I will register…" align="right" />23 years ago today, the domain name Think.com was registered.  Some of you might think you registered your first name a long time ago, but think about this; Think.com probably preceded <strong><em>your </em></strong>first registration by a decade or more.  Some of you might think you started registering domains too late, but think about this; 23 years from now, someone will be registering <strong><em>their</em></strong> first domain name.</p>
<p>In 1985, the year Think.com was registered:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Web browser had not yet been invented</li>
<li> Windows 1.0 was released, and Microsoft was a privately held company</li>
<li> Ronald Reagan was president of the United States</li>
<li> Mikhail Gorbachev became the Soviet leader</li>
<li> New Coke was released.  Anyone remember that?</li>
<li> Back to the Future was the top grossing film</li>
<li> The Berlin Wall was still up</li>
</ul>
<p>So, what were you thinking about in 1985?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/something-to-think-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
