<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Domainweek.com - Domain News, Entertainment, and More...</title>
	<link>http://www.domainweek.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:19:13 -0400</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Which is worse, the company name or their domain name?</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/29/which-is-worse-the-company-name-or-their-domain-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/29/which-is-worse-the-company-name-or-their-domain-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:19:13 -0400</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/29/which-is-worse-the-company-name-or-their-domain-name/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so I think I found the worst company name ever combined with the worst choice for domain names ever.  This one is so bad, it might even make Aaron from good URL bad URL cry.  It is so bad that I had to stop and take a picture of it (check out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/laptop-trandotcom.jpg" alt="TranDotCom - The puzzle image on the home page is a good fit for this puzzling name." align="right" />Ok, so I think I found the worst company name ever combined with the worst choice for domain names ever.  This one is so bad, it might even make Aaron from <a href="http://www.goodurlbadurl.com" title="Good URL, Bad URL" target="_blank">good URL bad URL</a> cry.  It is so bad that I had to stop and take a picture of it (check out the picture below).   My wife and I were driving to a restaurant when I noticed a sign with a company name - TranDotCom.  I said &#8220;Hey, that&#8217;s a pretty good domain name, Tran.com.&#8221;  My wife said, &#8220;Yeah, but why did they spell out the dot, instead of just using the symbol?&#8221;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/trandotcom.jpg" alt="TranDotCom Sign" /></p>
<p>I quickly pulled out my iPhone and entered &#8220;Tran.com&#8221; and sure enough, they do not own it.  I said, &#8220;you don&#8217;t think&#8230;&#8221; and then entered &#8220;TranDotCom.com&#8221; which not only worked, but made the story even better.  TranDotCom.com actually redirects to their company site at &#8220;www.TranDotCom.info.&#8221;  Yep, that&#8217;s right, their company website is officially <a href="http://www.TranDotCom.info" title="What?" target="_blank">TranDotCom.info</a>.  I&#8217;m sure they are a great company, but I wonder how much time they waste just explaining their website address to people.</p>
<p>Can you imagine working for that company and talking to a customer on the phone.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>TranDotCom Employee:</strong>   Hello and thank you for calling TranDotCom.<br />
<strong> Customer:</strong> Hi, I visited Tran.com and I could not find out anything about your company.<br />
<strong> TranDotCom Employee:</strong>  What website did you visit?<br />
<strong> Customer:</strong>  Tran.com<br />
<strong> TranDotCom Employee:</strong>  Oh, our website is actually TranDotCom.info.<br />
<strong> Customer:</strong>  Well, I just entered Tran.com.info and nothing happened.<br />
<strong> TranDotCom Employee:</strong>  Would you prefer to just send us an email?<br />
<strong> Customer:</strong> Sure, what is your email addres?<br />
<strong> TranDotCom Employee:</strong>  Our email address is info@trandotcom.info<br />
<strong> Customer:</strong>  Ok, got it.  info@tran.com.info</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, I think that they probably had a few too many conversations like that because after reviewing their website, it appears that for email they are using tdcemail.com.  <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Bonus Picture: Employee of the month parking spot</strong><br />
<img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/trandotcomparking.jpg" alt="Employee of the Month Parking" /><br />
Understandably, the employee in charge of domain name selection  has never parked there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/29/which-is-worse-the-company-name-or-their-domain-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UUOPD - Mix.com</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/20/uuopd-mixcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/20/uuopd-mixcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:37:55 -0400</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[UUOPD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/20/uuopd-mixcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today’s UUOPD (Unusual Usage of Premium Domains) website is Mix.com. Mix is not just a three letter domain, it is also a word with several uses.  Apparently though, the owner thinks the best use is to put a picture of a girl in a bunny suit with a couple of fire extinguishers, next to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/20/uuopd-mixcom/mixcom/" target="_blank" rel="attachment wp-att-71" title="Mix.com"><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/laptop-mix.jpg" alt="Mix.com" align="right" border="0" /></a>Today’s UUOPD (Unusual Usage of Premium Domains) website is <a href="http://www.mix.com" title="Greetings from MIX.COM !!" target="_blank">Mix.com</a>. Mix is not just a three letter domain, it is also a word with several uses.  Apparently though, the owner thinks the best use is to put a picture of a girl in a bunny suit with a couple of fire extinguishers, next to a picture of a daffy duck jack-in-the-box Christmas ornament.  I am starting to think that in order to get these images, the owner just went to Google image search, clicked the &#8220;I&#8217;m feeling lucky&#8221; button, and then did not get lucky.</p>
<p>Moving on, we see a couple of links that say &#8220;What we do&#8221; and link to Barnes and Noble.  The link shows results for a search on Barnes and Noble for the search term &#8220;Bill Youdleman.&#8221;  According to whois, Bill is the owner of this site.  According to the Barnes and Noble website, he is an engineer on these CDs, which I guess explains why he registered this domain name.</p>
<p>Seriously though, congrats to Bill for having the foresight to register such a great name seventeen years ago, in 1991. <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/06/20/uuopd-mixcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something to Think about&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/24/something-to-think-about/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/24/something-to-think-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:00:11 -0400</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/24/something-to-think-about/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[23 years ago today, the domain name Think.com was registered.  Some of you might think you registered your first name a long time ago, but think about this; Think.com probably preceded your first registration by a decade or more.  Some of you might think you started registering domains too late, but think about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/laptop-think.jpg" alt="I think I will register…" align="right" />23 years ago today, the domain name Think.com was registered.  Some of you might think you registered your first name a long time ago, but think about this; Think.com probably preceded <strong><em>your </em></strong>first registration by a decade or more.  Some of you might think you started registering domains too late, but think about this; 23 years from now, someone will be registering <strong><em>their</em></strong> first domain name.</p>
<p>In 1985, the year Think.com was registered:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Web browser had not yet been invented</li>
<li> Windows 1.0 was released, and Microsoft was a privately held company</li>
<li> Ronald Reagan was president of the United States</li>
<li> Mikhail Gorbachev became the Soviet leader</li>
<li> New Coke was released.  Anyone remember that?</li>
<li> Back to the Future was the top grossing film</li>
<li> The Berlin Wall was still up</li>
</ul>
<p>So, what were you thinking about in 1985?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/24/something-to-think-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only 3 weeks until DomainerCon - Domainer Networking in Atlanta</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/23/only-3-weeks-until-domainercon-domainer-networking-in-atlanta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/23/only-3-weeks-until-domainercon-domainer-networking-in-atlanta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:16:26 -0400</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/23/only-3-weeks-until-domainercon-domainer-networking-in-atlanta/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clear your calendars and get ready for the best (and perhaps only) domainer networking meetup in Atlanta this year.  DomainerCon is three weeks from tomorrow and the registration deadline is quickly approaching.  If you have not yet signed up, go to DomainerCon.com today and fill out the quick form to let us know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.DomainerCon.com"><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/laptop-domainercon.jpg" alt="DomainerCon Atlanta - A FREE Domainer Networking Conference" align="right" border="0" /></a>Clear your calendars and get ready for the best (and perhaps only) domainer networking meetup in Atlanta this year.  DomainerCon is three weeks from tomorrow and the registration deadline is quickly approaching.  If you have not yet signed up, go to <a href="http://www.DomainerCon.com">DomainerCon.com</a> today and fill out the quick form to let us know you are coming.  It is a free networking event, but we need to know how much space is needed.  The main event is from 5-7 pm on Saturday, June 14, but feel free to stay as late as you want.  Also, some people have expressed interest in getting together for breakfast the next day, so we may do that as well.  If you know of anyone in the Atlanta area that has not yet signed up, help us spread the word by letting them know.  We look forward to seeing you there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/23/only-3-weeks-until-domainercon-domainer-networking-in-atlanta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft should buy CNet</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/21/microsoft-should-buy-cnet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/21/microsoft-should-buy-cnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:05:02 -0400</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/21/microsoft-should-buy-cnet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Microsoft-Yahoo merger is not working out, and the guys at Microsoft seem like they don&#8217;t really know what to do.  This is not surprising though, as they have yet to put together a successful search engine strategy.  Their MSN Search is now Microsoft Live Search, online at Live.com. I wonder why they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/laptop-microcnet.jpg" alt="Microsoft.cnet" align="right" />The Microsoft-Yahoo merger is not working out, and the guys at Microsoft seem like they don&#8217;t really know what to do.  This is not surprising though, as they have yet to put together a successful search engine strategy.  Their MSN Search is now Microsoft Live Search, online at Live.com. I wonder why they picked &#8220;Live.com&#8221; as the name though.  Sure it is a great domain, but wouldn&#8217;t it be better used as a video site or social network?  The much more obvious name for a search engine is Search.com, and CNet owns it.</p>
<p>The CNet-CBS deal is not finalized, and if CNet receives a higher offer, they can take it.  Instead of Microsoft <a href="http://search.live.com/cashback" target="_blank">paying users to use their sub-par search engine</a>, why not  use a few bucks from their cash reserves and buy CNet.  It won&#8217;t necessarily fix their search problems, but it will give them a solid foundation for future online services such as:</p>
<blockquote><p>Search.com - to compete with Google<br />
Com.com - wildcard it to bring more visitors to search.com<br />
MP3.com - to compete with Apple iTunes<br />
Download.com - to promote their software<br />
Downloads.com - also to promote their software<br />
Computers.com - to promote Windows operating system<br />
Help.com - for customer support<br />
Chat.com - to promote Windows live messenger<br />
TV.com -  to help them get into the living room with interactive tv</p></blockquote>
<p>No doubt they will miss this opportunity though.  They started by underestimating the importance of the Internet, and they obviously underestimate the power of great generic domain names.  Oh well, maybe one day they will realize what they missed and perhaps they can just buy CBS.  <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/05/21/microsoft-should-buy-cnet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let go of your JUNK domains</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/30/let-go-of-your-junk-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/30/let-go-of-your-junk-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:57:43 -0400</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[expiring domains]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[registration tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/30/let-go-of-your-junk-domains/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been some talk lately about the need to trim the portfolio, but few specifics about how to do that.  Well, I would like to offer some specifics.  Keep in mind that these are just some guidelines, and I do not suggest you listen to everything I say.  I don&#8217;t even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/laptop-junk1.jpg" alt="Let go of your JUNK domains" align="right" />There has been some talk lately about the need to trim the portfolio, but few specifics about how to do that.  Well, I would like to offer some specifics.  Keep in mind that these are just some guidelines, and I do not suggest you listen to everything I say.  I don&#8217;t even follow all of these suggestions all the time <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Hopefully this list will help you with the decision process, but the bottom line is that there are no strict rules when deciding on what to keep and what to let go (or what to not register in the first place).</p>
<p><strong>PPC Names:</strong> Parked names that make more than their renewal fees are generally worth keeping.  Keep an eye on the renewal prices though, because they will likely increase by 7% a year for the foreseeable future.</p>
<p><strong>Trademark and Trademark Typo names: </strong>These names are often more trouble than they are worth.  Dump them now.</p>
<p><strong>Non .com Names: </strong>Many people will tell you to primarily invest in .com names, but that does not help you if you already own non .com domains.  If you own domain in an extension other than .com, check to see if the other extensions are also taken.  The best names are generally registered in .com, .net, .org, .info, and even .biz.  If you own the .biz and the .net is still available, consider dropping the name.  If you own any extension and the .com is available, consider dropping the name.</p>
<p><strong>Do you own all of the extensions?</strong>  Some people like to own the series, or every extension of a domain name, including the .com, .net, .org, .info, .biz. .mobi, and the .us (or other country code).  First, if you own all the extensions, chances are there is a reason they were all available.  Second, sometimes it is better if you own the .com and other people own the other extensions.  Sometimes they will develop a site and inadvertently increase your visitor count, and sometimes they will just want to buy your .com name.  If your main business uses the .com name, then it is ok to register the other extensions to protect your name, but if you are simply registering all of the extensions because you think it will make your .com name more valuable, consider dropping the non .com versions.</p>
<p><strong>Country code names:</strong>  Keep the name if it is a strong keyword in the cctld of the country you live in.  Avoid cctld names that try to brand themselves as something else.  For example .Bz. .cc, .la, .im, .me names.   A possible exception is .tv, but be sure to invest in a strong generic domain and watch out for high and potentially uncertain renewal fees.</p>
<p><strong>Brandables:</strong>  These names are called &#8220;brandables&#8221; because they are <strong>currently meaningless</strong> and <strong>must be heavily promoted or advertised</strong> by a company before they make sense.   Why would a company pick the name you own instead of just making up another meaningless and available &#8220;brandable&#8221; name. Consider dropping all but a few of your favorites.</p>
<p><strong>Does the name receive any visitors,</strong> or does the name have a <em>heartbeat</em>?  According to Frank Schilling, these are &#8220;names which somebody will either type into their address bar because <strong>the string means something</strong> to them, or names which people look-up the whois record of, to see who owns it.  Names which <strong>compel other human beings to take some form of action</strong>.&#8221;  This is perhaps one of the most important concepts that you should apply to your entire portfolio.</p>
<p><strong>One character makes a difference.</strong>  Atlanta.com is extremely valuable, Atlanta7.com is not. <strong>Order makes a difference.</strong>  PetFoodSupplies.com is in the correct order, SuppliesPetFood.com is not.</p>
<p><strong>New domain extensions</strong> such as .mobi, .asia, etc.:  While it is possible to profit from any extension, it is also important to note that the majority of investors in extensions such as these will be stuck with renewal fees for years before they will simply drop the name without an offer.  There is very little or no traffic coming to these names, so you will either need to develop or sell to an end user before renewal fees eat away all of your profit.</p>
<p><strong>Short domain</strong> &#8220;sellouts&#8221; like the &#8220;<a href="http://www.namepros.com/short-domain-discussion/393482-official-final-countdown-l-ll-ll.html" target="_blank">The official final countdown for L-LL and LL-L</a>.&#8221;  Most of these types of names appeal to newer domainers, and the potential for a good end user sale is very low.  You will be lucky if you make your money back, and this will likely be a very expensive lesson for quite a few people.  I am not talking about quality LLLL.coms or shorter names here, I am referring to names like N-N-N.com, L-L-L.net, NN-N.com, N-NN.com, LLLLL.net, etc in the current market.</p>
<p><strong>Are there advertisers?</strong>  If you go to Google and type in your domain name without the extension, are there advertisers for that term or terms?  Ideally, you should see three advertisers at the top before the search results, and quite a few advertisers in the column on the right side of the page.  If there are no advertisers, consider letting the name go.</p>
<p><strong>There are many other factors</strong> to consider, and sometimes you have to just go with what you believe in, regardless of what anyone else tells you.  So, what do you think, and what criteria do you use when deciding if you should register or renew a name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/30/let-go-of-your-junk-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UUOPD - Five.com</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/24/uuopd-fivecom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/24/uuopd-fivecom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:04:03 -0400</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[UUOPD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/24/uuopd-fivecom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today’s UUOPD (Unusual Usage of Premium Domains) website is Five.com.  Five.com unusual because when you visit the site, all you see is a black background and &#8220;five.com&#8221; in tiny white letters in the center of the screen.  You can&#8217;t really go anywhere or do anything, but hey, at least you know where you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/laptop-five.jpg" alt="Five.com" align="right" />Today’s UUOPD (Unusual Usage of Premium Domains) website is <a href="http://www.five.com" target="_blank">Five.com</a>.  Five.com unusual because when you visit the site, all you see is a black background and &#8220;five.com&#8221; in tiny white letters in the center of the screen.  You can&#8217;t really go anywhere or do anything, but hey, at least you know where you are, right?  What also makes this website unusual is that if you look at the source code of this extremely basic looking website you will see that it is slightly more complex than you think; it uses css for formating and statcounter to track visitor activity. What exactly was the owner thinking?  Perhaps the conversation went something like this:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Five.com owner:</strong> Sweet, I just registered five.com.<br />
<strong> Five.com owner&#8217;s friend:</strong>  That is a great name, what are you going to do with it?<br />
<strong> Five.com owner:</strong> I have big plans for this one.  First, I am going to show off my awesome coding skills by using css to create a black background.  White is lame, all the cool sites have black backgrounds these days.<br />
<strong> Five.com owner&#8217;s friend: </strong>You rock, and black backgrounds rule.  What are you going to do next?<br />
<strong> Five.com owner:</strong> Well, obviously I am going to use some tiny text to spell out the website address, and center that on the screen.  Then I will add statcounter code to see who is visiting.<br />
<strong> Five.com owner&#8217;s friend:</strong> Yeah, that way you can see who is visiting and where they are going on your site.  There are going to be other pages right?<br />
<strong> Five.com owner:</strong> No way.  I don&#8217;t want to confuse people with complex navigation and too many words.  I am just going to keep it simple.</p></blockquote>
<p> <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_question.gif' alt=':?:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.domainweek.com/category/uuopd/">Click here for more UUOPD websites</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/24/uuopd-fivecom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DomainerCon Atlanta - Join us on Saturday, June 14, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/21/domainercon-atlanta-join-us-on-saturday-june-14-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/21/domainercon-atlanta-join-us-on-saturday-june-14-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:30:39 -0400</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/21/domainercon-atlanta-join-us-on-saturday-june-14-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is DomainerCon?
It&#8217;s an open invitation domainer networking conference in Atlanta. Meet, greet, and network to your hearts content.
Where&#8217;s it gonna be held?
We&#8217;re hosting it in a social room in the Blue Ridge Grill. It holds about 50 people, so if we receive more registrations than that, we&#8217;ll have to relocate.
How much is it?
Nothing. It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.domainercon.com"><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/laptop-domainercon.jpg" alt="DomainerCon Atlanta - A FREE Domainer Networking Conference" align="right" border="0" /></a><strong>What is DomainerCon?<br />
</strong>It&#8217;s an open invitation domainer networking conference in Atlanta. Meet, greet, and network to your hearts content.</p>
<p><strong>Where&#8217;s it gonna be held?<br />
</strong>We&#8217;re hosting it in a social room in the Blue Ridge Grill. It holds about 50 people, so if we receive more registrations than that, we&#8217;ll have to relocate.</p>
<p><strong>How much is it?<br />
</strong>Nothing. It&#8217;s free. Just <a href="http://www.domainercon.com/">register</a> and you&#8217;ll receive the invitation and event information.</p>
<p align="left"> 															<strong>Who&#8217;s hosting this event?<br />
</strong>Ryan MacDonald &amp; Peter Askew are your fine hosts for this event. Peter and Ryan enjoy networking with other domainers, so they thought it might be fun to host a free event in Atlanta. <a href="http://domainercon.com" class="bodytext"></a></p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://domainercon.com" class="bodytext">More Info&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/21/domainercon-atlanta-join-us-on-saturday-june-14-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why was I banned from Google AdSense?</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/03/why-was-i-banned-from-google-adsense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/03/why-was-i-banned-from-google-adsense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:00:21 -0400</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/03/why-was-i-banned-from-google-adsense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, a little background.  I do not buy trademark names, I do not click on my own ads, I do not encourage anyone else to click on my ads, I do not promote anything illegal or questionable, and I do not do any arbitrage.  My sites are mostly informational in nature and generally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/laptop-adsense3.jpg" alt="No AdSense for you.  Next!" align="right" />First, a little background.  I do not buy trademark names, I do not click on my own ads, I do not encourage anyone else to click on my ads, I do not promote anything illegal or questionable, and I do not do any arbitrage.  My sites are mostly informational in nature and generally provide useful information about location specific activities (i.e., geodomains).  So I was surprised when I checked my email account and found this:</p>
<blockquote><p> While going through our records recently, we found that your AdSense account has posed a significant risk to our AdWords advertisers. Since keeping your account in our publisher network may financially damage our advertisers in the future, we&#8217;ve decided to disable your account.</p>
<p>Please understand that we consider this a necessary step to protect the interests of both our advertisers and our other AdSense publishers. We realize the inconvenience this may cause you, and we thank you in advance for your understanding and cooperation.</p>
<p>If you have any questions about your account or the actions we&#8217;ve taken, please do not reply to this email. You can find more information by visiting <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=57153&amp;hl=en_US" target="_blank">https://www.google.com/adsense<wbr></wbr>/support/bin/answer.py?answer<wbr></wbr>=57153&amp;hl=en_US</a>.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>The Google AdSense Team</p></blockquote>
<p>What? My account poses &#8220;a significant risk&#8221; to advertisers?  That makes no sense, so I checked my website statistics for all of the sites that contain adsense.   Everything looked fine.  So, I thought to myself, perhaps some bad traffic is coming my way.  The stats showed that there were no traffic spikes and the referrers looked ok.  Then I did a search on Google for each of my sites, and I found what I think was the problem.</p>
<p><strong>Someone else was using Google AdWords to advertise my website, using my exact domain name in the advertisement and linking the ad to my site!</strong></p>
<p>Now keep in mind that this is an expired domain that I purchased more than 10 weeks ago, and someone else was <em><strong>paying</strong></em> to advertise my site on Google.  Unfortunately, there was no way for me to find out who was doing this.  If I clicked on the ad (which I did not do) it would just take me to my site.  Was this the former owner who did not realize that they did not own the site anymore, or was this a savvy SEM expert who has figured out that if a competitor uses Google AdSense, you can simply advertise that competitor&#8217;s site and they will be banned by Google?  That SEM idea is probably a result of overthinking it, but I guess it could happen.</p>
<p>Whatever the reason, I was banned from AdSense, so I decided to do a bit of research.  According to their <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=57153&amp;hl=en_US#q5" target="_blank">FAQ</a>, because of my account suspension, <strong>the check I received yesterday has a stop payment on it and could not be cashed</strong>.   There were payments from clicks on my other sites on that check as well, but according to Google, when one site is bad, they all are.  Another FAQ says, &#8220;<a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=57153&amp;hl=en_US#q2" target="_blank">Can my account be reinstated</a>&#8221; and the answer contained a link to an appeal form.  I clicked that link and explained my case, then clicked submit, and then I waited.  I did another Google search to see if anyone else has had this problem.  Almost every case I read involving an account disablement ended in a permanent ban.  There seemed to be few if any cases that were reversed.  So then I waited some more.  Another day passed, and then I received this email:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hello,</p>
<p>We&#8217;re currently in the process of reviewing your account with the additional information that you&#8217;ve provided. Please understand, however, that there is no guarantee that your account will be reinstated into AdSense. As a reminder, Google does reserve the right to disable an account at any time, as stated in the AdSense Terms and Conditions (<a href="http://www.google.com/adsense/terms" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/adsense<wbr></wbr>/terms</a> ).</p>
<p>Thank you for your patience.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>The Google AdSense Team</p></blockquote>
<p>At this point, I was not optimistic about my chances.  I understand that Google must protect the advertisers, and the advertisers provide them with the majority of their revenue.  I thought that they would likely err on the side of caution, and that it was not likely that they would reverse their decision.  Then, three hours later, I received this email:</p>
<blockquote><p> As you know, Google treats instances of invalid click activity very seriously. We have reviewed your circumstances and have <strong>reinstated your account, effective immediately.</strong> However, there will be a delay before ads start running on your website. It may take up to 48 hours before all of our servers are informed of the change.</p>
<p>We appreciate your patience, and apologize for any inconvenience. If you have any questions, please feel free to respond to this email.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, although it was the right decision, I did not know if they would have time to actually look at the facts and I was prepared to move along without AdSense.  In fact, I already applied to the Yahoo Publisher Network and am planning to try Yahoo ads on that site.  I wonder if I can finally cash my AdSense check now.  <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mad.gif' alt=':mad:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>***Update by Ryan***</p>
<p>It is now 4 weeks later and I am still unable to cash this check. The check still has a stop payment on it, so even though I can login to my adsense account and Google ads appear on my sites, this check is no good.</p>
<p>***Update by Ryan***</p>
<p>On April 28 I received a new check from Google that includes the total from the old check as well as additional new earnings. The old check still has the stop payment on it, so if this happens to you, do not try to cash any checks that you are in possession of after your account is disabled. If your account is permanently disabled, the checks are worthless. If your account is reinstated, the checks you have not deposited are still worthless, but they will send you a replacement check next month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/03/why-was-i-banned-from-google-adsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada files UDRP against California over the domain name www.ca.gov</title>
		<link>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/01/government-of-canada-files-udrp-against-california-over-the-domain-wwwcagov/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/01/government-of-canada-files-udrp-against-california-over-the-domain-wwwcagov/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:00:56 -0400</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/01/government-of-canada-files-udrp-against-california-over-the-domain-wwwcagov/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government of Canada filed a complaint with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center  today over the domain name www.ca.gov.  The complainant alleges that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Canadian government website - www.gov.ca.   According to the filing, the complainant claims common law trademark and first use of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/laptop-ca.jpg" alt=".ca" align="right" />The government of Canada filed a complaint with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center  today over the domain name www.ca.gov.  The complainant alleges that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Canadian government website - www.gov.ca.   According to the filing, the complainant claims common law trademark and first use of the abbreviation &#8220;CA&#8221; and claims that the country of Canada was established prior to the establishment of the state of California.  Prime Minister Stephen Harper was quoted as saying, &#8220;The United States has <a href="http://www.usa.gov" target="_blank">http://www.usa.gov</a>, so shouldn&#8217;t Canada have <a href="http://www.ca.gov">http://www.ca.gov</a>?&#8221;  The governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, was unavailable for comment as he was busy filming the fourth installment of the Terminator series entitled <em>Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins</em>.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day" target="_blank">Happy April Fools Day</a>  <img src='http://www.domainweek.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domainweek.com/2008/04/01/government-of-canada-files-udrp-against-california-over-the-domain-wwwcagov/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
